4 found
Order:
  1.  11
    Investment Ethics and the Global Economy of Sports: The Norwegian Oil Fund, Formula 1 and the 2014 Russian Grand Prix.Hans Erik Næss - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 158 (2):535-546.
    As a sovereign wealth fund, the $1 trillion Norwegian Government Pension Fund-Global, which is managed by Norges Bank Investment Management on behalf of the welfare of Norway’s citizens, is supposed to be a flagship for socially responsible investments through its Council of Ethics. However, its investment in Delta Topco, the holding company of Formula 1 world championship that, through Formula One Group, brokered a deal with Russia to host a Formula 1 Grand Prix in 2014, raises the question of whether (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  8
    Sport governing bodies and the prioritization of human rights: a conceptual analysis of the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) dispute with Russia.Hans Erik Næss - forthcoming - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-14.
    This article addresses the moral and legal difficulties sport governing bodies encounter as human rights promoters. The case presented here is the 2023 decision by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to allow athletes from Russia and Belarus to compete in international sport under neutral colours, after recommending complete exclusion a year before due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. While IOC’s change of mind was influenced by UN experts on human rights, claiming that the ban discriminated against Russian athletes, the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  44
    The neutrality myth: why international sporting associations and politics cannot be separated.Hans Erik Næss - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 45 (2):144-160.
    ABSTRACTInternational sporting associations like the International Federation of Football Associations, the International Olympic Committee and Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile have throughout the twentieth century promoted political neutrality as a source of autonomy. With FIFA and the IOC’s official adherence to the United Nations’ human rights conventions in 2017, FIA remains one of the few large ISAs where neutrality is not underpinned by a corrective on human rights. However, this position is in conflict with the ethical obligations FIA contracted when it (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  29
    The Normative Legitimacy Gap: International Sports Associations, Human Rights and Stakeholder Democracy.Hans Erik Næss - 2019 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (2):129-145.
    This conceptual paper explores whether the normative legitimacy of International Sports Associations such as Fédération Internationale de Football Association and Fédération Internati...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark